Відео

Nah ... They are not zombies, they are just very sick people who are still alive... A regular undead zombie would probably attack them too ... That would be a hell of a fight that I would pay to see .. 😐🤔

There’s a gateway in our mind that leads somewhere out there, far beyond this plane. Where reptile aliens made of light cut you open and pull out all your pain.

As a Texan, I was always super self-conscious about having an accent bc it is so associated with ignorance and racism even though the people I grew up around were far, far from those things. But having that strong accent gets made fun of and looked down on and treated like you are bad or stupid, so you tone it down. Most ppl I know around here get embarrassed or offended if you say they have an accent or if it “slips out.” In fact when I lived in China I had a lot of ppl ask to hear the accent bc they were just curious, and there was someone randomly there from the same little hometown as my parents (crazy small world right?!) Anyway he adamantly refused to let anyone hear his Texas accent and went out of his way to avoid me if I used mine.

Hummm when you say quick image alien your can’t blame me when you have your guest host name right in the middle of the title

# en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oarfish

When researching the topic of as-of-yet unidentified marine animals, one comes across the following narrative and counter-narrative again and again, ad nauseam: We here confident, insistent reports, from hundreds of witnesses who have spent time on or near the water. Fishermen, mariners, sightseers, and pleasure-boaters, just to name a few. These people defy the disbelief and skepticism of others, braving the risk of ridicule, to earnestly report what they have beheld with their own senses. Many of these witnesses are professional and lifelong seafarers who are very familiar with the marine environment and its denizens. But why should there BE disbelief? Why should there BE ridicule? We know that many other creatures of immense size and power dwell in the deep. Why should the witnesses of sea serpents be disbelieved, while witnesses of whales are assumed to be truthful? Here, we come to the COUNTER-narrative. The reason why the public has been conditioned to disbelieve the sightings of serpent-like or dinosaur-like, animals in the water is that certain vain and self-important men have pompously and baselessly declared them to be nonexistent. Think about it- how could ANY man, no matter his scientific credentials, honestly be in a position to know the ENTIRE list of species that inhabit all the waters of the Earth? How, I ask you?! The answer is that he can not. And he should not. Nobody should be so self-deluded, so full of false pride, as to declare his knowledge of the planet's fauna to be exhaustive and entire. Yet that is precisely what many credentialed men (usually Englishmen) have claimed for themselves; the total knowledge of the Earth's inhabitants, and therefore the entitlement to declare any witness of an unknown species a liar. It is an absurd yet all-too-common phenomenon: people who were NOT present at a particular time and location where a sighting may have taken place declare that THEIR opinion of what the witnesses beheld must be more accurate and truthful than the witnesses themselves. Quite literally, people are declaring that their IGNORANCE is more valid than another person's knowledge. A knowledge based on lived experience, I might add. Next, the self-aggrandized arbiters of reality concoct a litany of counter-theories to dismiss what the eyewitnesses of an unknown creature beheld. The naysayers invent imaginary lines of leaping dolphins, whales swimming in single file, otters magnified by mist, and other scenarios unlikely to happen, in order to explain away what the witnesses beheld. The better and clearer the sighting has been, the more absurd and unlikely the counter-explanations become, until the naysayers are inventing events so ridiculously unlikely that they sound completely absurd. Still, in the mind of a self-professed "expert" who denies the existence of anything yet unknown to science, ANY preposterous fantasy of his own is more to believed than the simple fact that the eyewitnesses are telling the TRUTH. One cannot constantly claim that every witness of an unknown animal is mistakenly seeing something else without seriously impugning the intelligence of said witnesses. In order for the critics (who were NOT present at the sighting,) to be correct, the witnesses must always be either liars or gullible fantasists ignorant of the ocean and its lifeforms. And who are the witnesses in most cases? Mariners and fishermen, generally, or dwellers in coastal communities. In other words, people who have likely spent far MORE of their lives on or near the water than have the scoffing skeptics who call them fools. To sum up, the waters of the world contain many marvelous creatures. There is no chance whatsoever that we humans of today are already aware of them all. Many, many people report sightings of sea serpents, or of other marine mega-fauna yet unknown to science because such creatures EXIST. Of COURSE the exist! There is no reason why they should NOT exist, and there is no reason why witnesses of such creatures should be disbelieved. I believe that anybody who claims that his ignorance is more valid a yardstick of reality than is another person's knowledge should go down in the books of history as a pompous braggart, a liar and a fool.

The manananggal is indeed scary. But what's weird is that, it's not the only creature of its kind. There's the _Krasue_ , which is the disembodied head of a woman with dangling intestines that preys on pregnant women and fetuses. There's also a lot others, but it's kind of strange and fascinating (I guess?) at the same time that there *female* monsters with visible *viscera* that preys on *infants, pregnant women and unborn babies* in the *Southeast Asian* region. I mean, if it's so widespread, it could just have a real origin..........

Similar to Ambiguity.

Now we have the basilisk, dragons og the deathworm. All greatly depicted beautifuly in this stories. ❤But what with the great lindworm, or the monstrous world serpent. Both are Well known in my country. Those created on Storied is a must. 😊

I got flower or petal !

Their infected, not zombies.

The authenticity of the Patterson gimlin film has not been disproven. Despite the assumption of many a criticic, no costume replication professionally made or otherwise has been able to match the subject in the film. I like your show but as a critical analysis I feel you guys dropped the ball on this one. Especially considering that old film and it's mysterious subject. From the inhuman body proportions, to the musculature, to the breast's, to the many fine details discovered over the years which not only would be strange for hoaxers to include but would be *impossible for costume makers of the time to create*. They just didn't have the technology at that time to make a costume of that caliber. So, is it real? We don't know. But that film alone raises more questions than answers when analyzed critically.

“They say if you read aloud from this book, you can’t get rid of The Babadook. But they forget: If you don’t support gay rights, you won’t be able to sleep at night.” -The Babadook, Maybe

This channel is just too left leaning. Traditional grammar maybe too rigid and the rules maybe too difficult to follow. Nevertheless, advocating no focus on it is too much of an opinion.

I had to post a comment here in response to the title. I will leave this tab open, and return at a later time to watch the entirety of the above video. A portion of the title inquires as to the reason why Grays are so common. Then at 0:52, the narrator questions, " . . . why are grays the ones mostly responsible for all the abductions?" Somewhat of a loaded question, for the narrator (or possibly the writer) has made some major assumptions before pursuing an answer. Who ever claimed Grays were so common, which implies that they are the most common extraterrestrials? What proof is there to back up this claim/assumption? Also, who then claimed that Grays were responsible for most of the abductions taking place? Further, what proof is there to back this assumption up? There is no actual proof for either, and if anybody actually told you those claims about Grays without expounding upon each statement, then I would not put any faith into any other claim made by that person! Okay, I openly admit that as far as the number of reports being made regarding observation of an extraterrestrial, Grays, by far, make up the large majority of reports. Reports which would be classified, under J. Allen Hynek's sixfold classification for UFO sightings, as a number 6, or more commonly known as a "Close Encounter of the Third Kind" (CE3), and utilizing Ted Bloecher's proposed six subtypes for the CE3 in Hynek's scale, we would have a #6, CE3 for most reported sightings, and would have one of the following subtypes: B, C, D, or E. Allegedly a book was found by Dante Santori and his friend, Petro, that allegedly was a guide book given to new KGB agents that covered all of the alien races known at the time. It has over fifty alien races listed! The following link is to a video which there is no real reason to watch, outside of curiosity, but there is a link in its description where you can obtain a copy of the Alien Races Book if interested: ua-cam.com/video/0Rc_2kbgc_I/v-deo.html This link is to a 25 minute long video of Dante Santori talking about the book, and some of the events surrounding its discovery: ua-cam.com/video/tFxnY9XABHw/v-deo.html Okay, returning back to my point, leaving the scenic tangent behind, I merely want to paint another possibility that many may not have considered. Just because Grays are the most commonly reported extraterrestrials overall, and especially in regards to abductions, the sheer quantity of reports alone does not, and shall not, serve as proof that they are the most common, only that they are the most commonly reported. Hence, some other alien race may be more common, and possibly even responsible for even more abductions than what the Grays are responsible for committing. Perhaps Grays are the most commonly reported alien race to be encountered simply because they are the only ones who actually return most of their abductees. It seems the abductions are focused around fertility, breeding, and survival of their species. While on the other hand, other alien species who engage in human abductions, allegedly do so for one of three reasons, of which the first is for food, the second is for slave labor, and the third is for various experimentation, including genetics, and crossbreeding. So, one of the other races could easily be abducting humans for slave labor at a greater rate than the frequency at which Grays abduct. However, because those aliens will never have any interest or benefit to return the humans they have abducted, and likely worked to death as slave labor, those abductees will never have a chance to report their abductions. This is merely one possible explanation as to how the numbers of reports concerning the Grays may actually be skewed from reality. The reported cases clearly show Grays as the most common alien encountered, especially in regards to abductions, but these reported cases are made by abductees who were returned. Understandably, not all abductees will file a report of their experience, but they have the choice . . . where abductees of other alien races typically will never have such an opportunity to make the choice of filing a report or not. I'm a math person, and I believe numbers can hold great power. However, I do not allow my faith to blind me. Numbers may allude, illustrate, and even demonstrate that some thing is in a specific state, or it possesses a particular element, or a certain characteristic, but those numbers may not account for all determining factors, such as not every abductee having the opportunity to file a report on their abduction. If one does all of their thinking within some box, then any thinking performed will not be much in terms of being critical, for containing all of your thinking inside of a box does not account for the reality that exists outside of said box, which is nearly all of reality, for the interior of said box can only contain a insignificant amount of reality. It is vital to think outside of any proverbial box that has likely been constructed purposefully within your own mind as a mechanism to limit your analytical thinking to a level which is nearly negligible. Don't take anything at face valued, for whatever it may be, such face value was created by someone else, someone who you have no clue as to the amount of analysis they might have used to arrive at some conclusion, nor how much of other people's works, and assessments, this stranger may have taken at face value themselves. A ton of data is great, but one needs to ensure that it is applied appropriately, and that it will compensate for all particular possibilities. Things are not as they appear!!!

This channel is just too left-leaning. Saying that African American English is stigmatised and trying to regularise its use is just too opinionated!

Besides “demonstrate”, “monster” is also a cognate of Spanish «mostrar» (to show).

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 who is actually Grim Reaper’s mom

Who is actually Grim Reaper?

here is my own list of long words that i’ve dubbed “words that have no reason to be so long” along with a couple i’ve grabbed from this video sorted of course by longest to shortest pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis (longest word in a dictionary) antidistablishmentarianism ( used as a comparison ) anthropomorphisation incomprehensibilities compartmentalizing internationalization uncharacteristically recommendations photoluminescent monosaccharides acknowledgement environmentalism

Is a born protector who died for us evil or good you tell me

theres a word in korean hyeoraekhyeongeun (혈액형은) that asks “whats your blood type” cause blood type is such a major part of categorizing who you are

not sure if this really counts but i think the closest to a universal language is arabic numbers. and of course in the more modern age: emojis/emoticons

What a fad

Don't you mean hyborian, hyperborean,or hybrasilian I'm hyborians we the magic and we mixed with Caucasian slave but not Caucasian what y'all call us now black or African American

I don't think it has one eye I don't think it has a mouth on his stomach although it may possess a pouch who knows. When natives are shown a book of past and present animals almost all of them picked the giant ground sloth.

Sorry, but I still hear very strong southern American accents. Some I hardly understand as a Canadian.

I used to call my kids Bean or Beanie (for Beanie Baby)

This came out 8 days ago and it never showed up on my suggested?! Come on UA-cam I don't follow that many channels

Fun-fact. Irish legends are from Gaelic mythology. The "Keltoi" was a loose assortment of tribes living in Eastern France, Austria and Southern Germany. The "Keltoi" did not make it to Ireland. Gaelic Ireland, which formed from before 1AD with a common language, customs and laws (Brehon), did not identify as "Celt".

I remember hearing that the Reverend often introduced himself as 'Spoctor Dooner' rather than Doctor Spooner!

Lol when i speak i write the words im saying in the air with my fingers, anyone else?

The o in oesophagus and diarrhoea

Why do educated people still use the fake picture of Nessy? You are a doctor, please do not use false images 😮😊

Did you just want to do an episode with lots of cats?

I lived in the Florida Panhandle for a while in 2020. I can attest to the fact that the Southern accent is still going very, VERY strong!

My goat is the most common article

Antidisestablishmentarianism feels a bit relevant to what's going on in the US today.

Can't speak definitely for the "southern" accent but I can vouch that the hick accent is alive and well all throughout the south...

The southern accent had to disappear. The American left made their base believe if you heard someone with that accent they were “racist”.

Wait for all intentsev purposes is an egg horn (I am aware that intentsev is spelled incorrectly even as a native speaker English is still hard )

Alive and Happy to Be So 😂😂😂 ❤

Batufully done

As a Filipino, I get semantically satiated with the word "mga" often.

Its literally called the rage virus lmao

in my beautiful land Brazil we have a humungous dictionary for queer slangs 😂 one time it made into a question in the national exam for high school. The question itself was pretty simple: is it a language or a way people from a specific social group use? something like that. the conservatives got crazy 😂😂😂

few years ago I was able to acknowledge that my gf at the time was cheating on me thru a screenshot of a text message (about 50 words) a mutual friend posted on his status. I asked her if she was in touch with him because "it's been a long time since we talked last and I'm wondering how he's doing" she confirmed, then I showed her the screenshot of said post, alongside 3 or 4 screenshots from our own conversation and pointed how similar it was. She confessed everything.

I love how a lot of USA stories actually come from pagans and Celts 🥰

The 1980s version I saw of Little Shop Of Horrors still has Audrey and Seymour eaten by Audrey II and the alien plants invade and take over the Earth.

Thumbsdown for the snide character in the delivery. Oh well, world spins on.